Chapter 7 — 1930–1939: The Archive Burns

Cold open

Picture: Nazi forces enter the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft; library shelves; photographs of book burning; an empty study table; a passport stamp; a Paris bar after dark; a Harlem nightclub; a film projector beam.

Narration: “On May 6, 1933, Nazi students and paramilitaries raided Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science. Its books, files, and research were seized. Days later, much of its library burned in public. The attack did more than destroy a building. It tried to erase the evidence that people had made lives, knowledge, and community beyond the rules of the state.”

Narration, continued: “But archives are never only shelves. They survive in exile, in novels, in photographs, in a song, in a shared apartment, and in the memories people carried away.”

Act I — Laws and authoritarian turns

Trace Nazi escalation precisely. Paragraph 175 already criminalized sexual acts between men, but the Nazi government’s June 28, 1935 revision of Paragraphs 175 and 175a broadened the range of punishable conduct. The revised law could reach alleged sexual acts, words, gestures, and other behavior construed as sexual, and it strengthened penalties. This legal expansion facilitated systematic persecution of men accused of homosexuality.[1]

Keep the gendered scope visible. Paragraph 175 applied to men, not women, though lesbian and gender-nonconforming women were not safe from Nazi repression. They could face surveillance, censorship, employment loss, persecution through other categories, and pressure to conform to the regime’s racial and reproductive ideals. Do not use the absence of a female equivalent to Paragraph 175 as evidence that women were free.[2]

Explain the intersections of sexuality with antisemitism, racism, fascism, class, disability, colonialism, and political repression. Hirschfeld was targeted as a Jewish sexologist, a public advocate of sexual reform, and a symbol of the Weimar culture Nazis denounced. The state’s attack on queer life cannot be separated from its wider project of racial purification, authoritarian control, and destruction of political opposition.

Italy, Spain, Japan, and colonial settings require their own legal and political frames. Fascist Italy used police surveillance, confinement, and administrative sanctions; the Spanish Civil War and the Francoist victory closed or destroyed many progressive and artistic worlds; Japanese militarism narrowed cultural space; colonial governments combined imported law with racial and moral regulation. Avoid presenting fascism as a single identical policy exported everywhere.

Democratic states did not provide a simple alternative. Britain, the United States, and other countries maintained criminal laws, police campaigns, censorship regimes, and professional pressures that constrained queer life. The contrast is not between persecution and freedom, but between distinct systems of policing, surveillance, and public respectability.

Suggested narration: “Authoritarianism did not invent prejudice. It gathered older laws, medical fears, racial myths, and police powers—and made them instruments of the state.”

Act II — City worlds under threat

Berlin: The city’s public queer infrastructure was dismantled: organizations were banned, magazines closed, bars threatened, the Institute destroyed, and people driven underground, into exile, prison, or death. Do not use a single book-burning image as if it tells the entire story. Pair it with maps of residences, venues, offices, and flight routes to show the many forms of loss.

Paris and London: Both cities absorbed exiles while retaining their own legal and social constraints. Parisian nightlife and expatriate networks continued under economic strain and political polarization. London’s communities adapted through guarded venues, private homes, theater, and coded social knowledge. Exile was not safety; it could mean insecure work, immigration barriers, language loss, and separation from loved ones.

Harlem and Chicago: Depression pressures changed nightlife, work, housing, and artistic networks. Black queer people faced a compounded landscape of racism, economic insecurity, respectability politics, and police surveillance. The narrative should avoid implying that U.S. cities were secure havens simply because their crisis did not take the same form as Nazi Germany’s.

Tokyo and Shanghai: Militarism, war, and occupation disrupted urban entertainment and transnational social worlds. Shanghai’s nightlife and port culture were shaped by invasion, colonial power, refugee movement, and unequal legal jurisdictions. Tokyo’s commercial and print cultures continued under tightening political constraints. Maps must show migration, occupation, and exile routes—not only national borders.

Los Angeles: Hollywood’s studio system offered work and social connection while intensifying image management. The production code, increasingly enforced from 1934, limited explicit representation on screen; off screen, studios managed publicity, reputations, contracts, and marriage narratives. This is the setting for Dietrich, de Acosta, Haines and Shields, and the evidentiary limits surrounding other famous names.

Act III — People and constellations

Magnus Hirschfeld and Karl Giese: Hirschfeld was abroad when the Nazis raided the Institute and never returned to Germany. Exile separated him from the institution he had built; he died in Nice in 1935. Karl Giese also fled Nazi persecution, moving through exile and precarious work before his death in 1938. Their story embodies how fascist violence fractured not only an archive but a domestic and professional partnership.[3]

Federico García Lorca: Lorca was arrested near Granada in August 1936 and murdered during the opening months of the Spanish Civil War. His sexuality, left-wing associations, cultural prominence, and conflict with local political forces all belong to the historical context, but the exact motives and chain of responsibility remain contested. The script should not reduce his murder to a single-cause story or turn him into a symbol detached from his art, family, and political world.

Djuna Barnes: Barnes’s Nightwood (1936) gives literary form to desire, gender variance, exile, loss, and the emotional wreckage of Parisian relationships. Its relation to Barnes’s past relationship with Thelma Wood is significant but not one-to-one. The novel is an artistic transformation, not a coded documentary whose characters can simply be “solved.”

Gladys Bentley: Bentley’s movement from Harlem to California shows how changing economic and policing conditions reshaped a performer’s life. Her tuxedoed performance persona and women-centered audiences remain historically important, but this chapter should not falsely suggest that her earlier public freedom continued unchanged through the decade. The Depression, the end of Prohibition, heightened policing, and changing entertainment markets altered what could be performed and where.

Daphne du Maurier: Du Maurier’s Rebecca (1938) belongs in the late-decade media story. The novel’s absent central woman, Mrs. Danvers’s devotion to Rebecca, costume and disguise, domestic surveillance, and anxious femininity have made it a lasting site of queer interpretation. Call it a queer reading, not proof that the novel directly reveals an author’s private relationships.[4]

Marlene Dietrich: In Morocco (1930), Dietrich appears in a tuxedoed nightclub performance and kisses a woman. The scene is one of pre-Code Hollywood’s most striking images of gender transgression and same-sex theatrical desire. It demonstrates what was visible on screen before more stringent Production Code enforcement narrowed representational possibilities. Do not use the scene as proof of any particular private relationship.[5]

Mercedes de Acosta: De Acosta’s 1930s papers preserve letters, manuscripts, photographs, and ephemera from a network spanning theater, literature, and Hollywood. Use her archive to teach method: evidence can establish friendship, correspondence, affection, and sometimes intimacy, but it cannot be made to settle every later rumor about a celebrity affair.[6]

William Haines and Jimmie Shields: As Haines’s screen career declined, his long-term relationship with Shields continued. In 1935 they began the interior-design work that became their second career. Their shared household, business, and decades-long partnership make them a well-documented counterpoint to cases built primarily on studio publicity or later speculation.[7]

The archive and the rumor: Cary Grant and Randolph Scott shared homes and appeared in studio photographs depicting relaxed domestic bachelorhood. Those facts are documented; a sexual relationship is not. Katharine Hepburn’s trousers, friendships, and unconventional screen persona have also made her a figure of later queer identification, but such identification does not prove a particular private relationship. Use this segment to establish a series-wide rule: public images can produce queer readings without becoming proof of private conduct.

Act IV — Media: an archive of imagined possibility

Featured media: Nightwood (1936). The novel’s Parisian and transnational world holds desire, betrayal, gender variance, and displacement in a modernist form. Use Barnes’s prose, period editions, and Paris imagery to show how literature can preserve an emotional atmosphere when official archives are hostile, incomplete, or destroyed.

Featured media: Mädchen in Uniform (1931). Leontine Sagan’s German film, adapted from Christa Winsloe’s play, centers Manuela’s love for her teacher, Fräulein von Bernburg, within an authoritarian Prussian girls’ school. It is a major early film of women’s desire and agency, made shortly before the Nazi seizure of power. Its later history of exile, censorship, and survival should be presented as part of the story, not as an afterthought.[8]

Featured media: Rebecca (1938). Frame its queer significance through interpretation. Mrs. Danvers’s relationship to Rebecca, the second Mrs. de Winter’s identification and rivalry, and the novel’s preoccupation with femininity, costume, and domestic power have made the text meaningful to queer readers. Do not use that meaning to erase its other concerns or to claim it as an unambiguous autobiographical statement.[4]

Featured media: Morocco (1930). Dietrich’s tuxedo performance offers a visual bridge from Weimar cabaret to pre-Code Hollywood. Use a rights-cleared still or a recreated graphic only after confirming permissions. Explain that the sequence did not establish a tolerant Hollywood; it shows a fleeting representational opening before the code’s stricter enforcement.

Featured media: propaganda and absence. Nazi propaganda represented homosexuality as a danger to the Volk, while state violence eliminated venues, publications, and personal collections. Do not reproduce propaganda unframed. Place it in an analytical visual field with captions explaining authorship, intended audience, and political purpose.

Suggested narration: “When the state burns an archive, art can become a different kind of evidence—not proof of a private fact, but a record of what a culture could imagine, desire, and fear.”

Ending bridge

Return to the Institute’s destroyed library. Cut to a passport, a letter, Nightwood, a film frame from Mädchen in Uniform, a Paris street, and a Haines–Shields interior.

Narration: “The archive burned. People fled. Some were arrested; some disappeared; some survived by becoming less visible. But the stories did not vanish. They crossed borders in memory, in art, in letters, and in the lives people built after the world that made them had been destroyed.”

Reference atlas: visual, press, sound, and reading

• USHMM: Paragraph 175; USHMM: Revision of Paragraph 175; Pink Triangle Legacies; and Institute history. Use Holocaust-history sources to distinguish the 1935 statutory expansion from the broader campaign of persecution.
• Richard Plant, The Pink Triangle; Claudia Schoppmann, National Socialist Persecution of Lesbian Women; Laurie Marhoefer, Sex and the Weimar Republic.
• A Day in London (1936); Berlin 1930s search; Spanish Civil War search; Library of Congress Great Depression photographs: discovery sources only. Verify source, date, creator, restoration, licensing, and caption accuracy for each chosen item.
• Portrait leads: Lorca, Barnes, Hirschfeld, Bentley, Dietrich, de Acosta, Haines, Grant, and Scott. Verify each file individually.
• Djuna Barnes, Nightwood (1936); Internet Archive search for Mädchen in Uniform; Andrea Weiss, Vampires and Violets; Margaret Forster, Daphne du Maurier; Maria Riva, Marlene Dietrich; Rosenbach Mercedes de Acosta Papers finding aid; William J. Mann, Wisecracker.
• Music plan: original cabaret- and swing-influenced score, used with restraint. Do not treat commercial 1930s recordings as royalty-free. Clear the recording, musical composition, arrangement, performance, and territory separately.

Research and ethics note

Every photograph, film still, letter, archival file, or propaganda image requires item-level clearance and context. Do not use concentration-camp imagery, book-burning footage, or an individual’s exile record as aesthetic shorthand. State what an object documents, what institution produced it, and what it cannot reveal about private identity or intimacy.

Chapter notes

[1] United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, “Revision of Paragraph 175,” June 28, 1935, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/timeline-event/holocaust/1933-1938/revision-of-paragraph-175.

[2] Claudia Schoppmann, National Socialist Persecution of Lesbian Women, trans. Allison Brown (Berlin: Metropol, 2016).

[3] Heike Bauer, The Hirschfeld Archives: Violence, Death, and Modern Queer Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2017); Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft, “The First Institute for Sexual Science (1919–1933),” accessed August 12, 2026, https://magnus-hirschfeld.de/ausstellungen/institute/.

[4] Margaret Forster, Daphne du Maurier: The Secret Life of the Renowned Storyteller (London: Chatto & Windus, 1993); queer interpretations of Rebecca should be attributed as interpretation rather than treated as biographical proof.

[5] Maria Riva, Marlene Dietrich (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992); Andrea Weiss, Vampires and Violets: Lesbians in Film (New York: Penguin, 1992).

[6] Rosenbach Museum and Library, The Mercedes de Acosta Papers, finding aid, accessed August 12, 2026, https://rosenbach.squarespace.com/s/The-Mercedes-de-Acosta-Papers.pdf.

[7] William J. Mann, Wisecracker: The Life and Times of William Haines, Hollywood’s First Openly Gay Star (New York: Viking, 1998).

[8] University of Florida, Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, “Mädchen in Uniform (1931),” accessed August 12, 2026, https://languages.ufl.edu/madchen-in-uniform/.

Back to Contents